MSN Writing Services

NURS FPX 6109 Assessment 3 Educational Technologies Comparison

Student Name Capella University NURS-FPX 6109 Integrating Technology into Nursing Education Prof. Name Date Part 1 The infusion of technology into the realm of education has precipitated a transformative shift in learning and instructional methodologies. A noteworthy advancement in this domain is the advent of Learning Management Systems (LMSs), which has significantly influenced nursing education. These platforms have revolutionized the educational experience for nursing students by providing an interactive and adaptive learning environment. This assessment endeavors to scrutinize two prominent LMSs, namely Canvas and Blackboard, evaluating their respective features, benefits, and capabilities. The ultimate objective is to ascertain the most suitable system for teaching and learning scenarios within the context of nursing education. Description of Technology In nursing education, an LMS is characterized as a software application utilized by educators to generate, oversee, and deliver courses and programs to students. It serves a pivotal role in managing records, administering courses, monitoring student progress, and disseminating learning materials. These systems often encompass collaborative features, empowering educators to develop course materials, articulate learning objectives, align content with assessments, and monitor student advancements (Hermosisima et al., 2023). The specific LMS platforms under scrutiny are Canvas and Blackboard. Canvas, recognized for its reliability, customizability, adaptability, and mobile-friendliness, is designed to enable institutions to construct a digital learning environment tailored to their unique challenges. Conversely, Blackboard, a stalwart in the LMS market, offers a suite of educational tools for course management, a virtual learning environment, and various services such as gradebooks, mass notification services, and plagiarism detection software (Liu & Yu, 2022). Comparison of Features, Benefits, and Capabilities Feature, Capability, and Benefit Version 1 (CANVAS): Canvas is lauded for its clean, intuitive, and modern user interface (UI). Both the dashboard and course navigation receive acclaim for their user-friendly and straightforward design, catering even to those with limited tech experience. Version 2 (BLACKBOARD): Blackboard boasts a robust and functional UI but presents a steeper learning curve, demanding more time for familiarization, especially for those new to the system. Customization Canvas offers a high degree of customization, allowing educators to tailor course designs to their preferences or institutional requirements, affording learners flexibility in adjusting their learning environments. Blackboard permits customization, albeit not as flexible or comprehensive as Canvas. The ability to personalize exists but with potentially more limited options. Mobile Access Canvas features a well-designed mobile app that mirrors much of the web platform’s functionality, providing a seamless experience for students and teachers across devices. Blackboard offers a functional mobile app but with fewer features compared to its web interface or the Canvas mobile app. Integration with Third-Party Apps Canvas excels in extensive integration options with third-party apps, enriching its functionality and enabling a more tailored learning environment. Blackboard also supports integration with third-party apps, but the number of integrations is not as extensive as Canvas. Learning Analytics Canvas provides comprehensive analytics tools enabling educators to monitor student progress and engagement, facilitating informed instructional decisions and identification of struggling students. Blackboard also offers analytics capabilities, although they may not be as extensive or user-friendly as Canvas’s analytics tools. Part 2 Assumptions The comparison between Canvas and Blackboard is predicated on several assumptions. It is assumed that all users possess the necessary hardware and stable internet access for utilizing these online platforms. Additionally, users are presumed to have a basic understanding of computers, enabling effective navigation and use of these platforms. While both Canvas and Blackboard function as Learning Management Systems (LMSs), their differences in user interface, customization options, mobile accessibility, integration with third-party apps, and learning data analysis are explored in this comparison. By evaluating these aspects, this comparison serves as a foundation for decision-making regarding the most suitable technology for educational requirements in the context of nursing education (Aithal & Aithal, 2023; Mahmoud & Withorn, 2023). Benefits and Limitations of Comparing Similar Educational Technologies Comparing Canvas and Blackboard provides valuable insights for decision-making by juxtaposing their features, benefits, and capabilities. This analysis reveals that Canvas excels over Blackboard in terms of user interface and integration with third-party tools, crucial aspects for decision-makers prioritizing user experience and technological adaptability (Hermosisima et al., 2023). However, it is imperative to acknowledge the limitations of this comparative approach. While it facilitates the evaluation of features and functionalities, it may not fully capture the diverse user experiences offered by each platform. User preferences may vary, with some finding Canvas more intuitive, while others may prefer Blackboard due to familiarity. Hence, it is essential to recognize that this comparison may not universally represent the experiences of all users (Liu & Yu, 2022). Analysis Suitable Teaching and Learning Situations When identifying suitable situations for using Canvas and Blackboard in teaching and learning, their distinctive characteristics must be considered. Canvas, with its modern user interface, customization options, mobile app compatibility, integration with third-party apps, and robust analytics tools, excels in dynamic learning environments embracing technology. It proves advantageous for educators experimenting with teaching approaches that utilize analytics to track student progress and adapt teaching methods based on data (Biliuk et al., 2023). NURS FPX 6109 Assessment 3 Educational Technologies Comparison On the other hand, Blackboard’s strengths lie in its established reputation and comprehensive feature set. While it may lack the interface and extensive third-party integration of Canvas, it remains a reliable choice for educational institutions valuing stability and functionality over cutting-edge design or extensive customization. Blackboard is well-suited for teaching environments where users prioritize a familiar platform and may not require extensive customization or third-party integrations (Biliuk et al., 2023; Hermosisima et al., 2023). The decision between Canvas and Blackboard hinges on the specific needs and context of teaching and learning scenarios. Canvas is apt for dynamic, data-driven environments, while Blackboard is suitable for those preferring a stable approach. Incorporating Technology into a Specific Program Integrating a Learning Management System (LMS) like Canvas or Blackboard into a nursing education program has the potential to revolutionize the teaching and learning process, offering advantages that contribute to positive outcomes. However, the approach to integration may vary based

NURS FPX 6109 Assessment 2 Vila Health: The Impact of Educational Technology

Student Name Capella University NURS-FPX 6109 Integrating Technology into Nursing Education Prof. Name Date The Educational Technology Impact Advancements in educational technology play a crucial role in driving improvements in healthcare. As part of our strategic initiative, our organization is exploring the integration of an advanced Learning Management System (LMS). This impact statement assesses the implications of this shift on various stakeholders: learners, the organization, and, most importantly, our patients, offering insights into the potential advantages and challenges ahead. Description of New Educational Technology or Changes in Current Technology Use To remain at the forefront of digital transformation and enhance patient care efficiency, our organization is contemplating the adoption of an upgraded Learning Management System (LMS). This cutting-edge platform aims to revolutionize our staff’s learning experience, providing nursing personnel with improved accessibility, user convenience, and interactive learning options. The LMS, designed to cultivate a culture of continuous learning, will deliver training modules covering a wide range of nursing topics and best practices, thereby enhancing the professional skills of our team (Manhiça et al., 2022). The shift from traditional in-person instructional methods to this contemporary, digital-centric platform signifies a significant change in our educational technology utilization. Embracing this change demonstrates our commitment to incorporating technology to improve education delivery, adapt to the changing needs of our staff, and, most importantly, enhance patient care. This planned technology upgrade underscores our dedication to elevating the learning experience for our nursing staff, thereby driving improvements in their competence and the quality of patient care delivery. Alignment of Proposed Educational Technology Changes with the Organization’s Mission, Vision, Values, and Goals The proposed implementation of an advanced Learning Management System (LMS) is intricately linked to our organization’s mission, vision, values, and strategic objectives. Our mission statement emphasizes delivering the highest standard of patient care. The commitment to improvement is reinforced by the LMS, serving as a platform to provide easily accessible training for our nursing staff. We believe in staying up-to-date and embracing innovation to establish ourselves as a leading healthcare institution (Sáiz Manzanares et al., 2020). The LMS also embodies our values of learning and adaptability, creating an environment that fosters a culture of knowledge acquisition and skill enhancement. By offering learning paths, the LMS promotes adaptability, allowing our nursing staff to effectively balance work commitments with their training needs. Furthermore, the focus on delivering patient care remains at the forefront of this proposed advancement, demonstrating our dedication to quality and patient satisfaction. Lastly, the strategic objective of enhancing staff competency and improving outcomes is directly addressed by the LMS, making it an essential component in achieving our goals (Tsarfati & Cojocaru, 2022). Impact of Proposed Educational Technology Changes on the Organization The implementation of the proposed Learning Management System (LMS) has the potential to revolutionize our organization. This change aims to simplify procedures by offering a platform for training resources that promote knowledge exchange and facilitate adaptable learning. The LMS will accommodate the diverse schedules of our nursing staff, providing them the opportunity to engage in skill development without sacrificing their role’s obligations. As nursing competence improves, we foresee an enhanced standard of patient care, aligning with our organization’s primary objective (Sáiz-Manzanares et al., 2020). NURS FPX 6109 Assessment 2 Vila Health: The Impact of Educational Technology While the benefits are substantial, we must also consider potential hurdles. Some staff may initially resist the change, particularly those less accustomed to digital learning environments. We might encounter technical issues, and there will certainly be a need for additional training to ensure everyone is proficient in using the new system (Tsarfati & Cojocaru, 2022). However, with well-planned change management strategies, these challenges can be addressed effectively. Moreover, the decision to invest in this advanced LMS is a clear demonstration of our commitment to continuous learning and advancement. It signals our resolve to nurture an innovative and progressive learning culture, reinforcing our dedication to delivering exceptional healthcare in this digital age (Poór et al., 2020). Role of the Nurse Educator in Implementing Proposed Educational Technology Changes The nurse educator will be the linchpin in implementing the new Learning Management System (LMS). As a change advocate, the nurse educator will promote the new technology, elucidate its benefits, and address any resistance or fears from the staff. Their role extends to conducting training sessions to ensure staff proficiency with the system and providing ongoing support. By observing the system’s use, they will assess its effectiveness, collect staff feedback, and make necessary modifications to enhance its performance. Their ultimate goal is to ensure that the LMS contributes positively to the learning objectives, thereby elevating nursing competencies and, by extension, patient care outcomes (Sáiz-Manzanares et al., 2020). The nurse educator’s actions have significant implications for the organization. Through the successful implementation and ongoing management of the LMS, the organization demonstrates a commitment to continuous learning and innovation. This can boost the organization’s reputation, aligning with its strategic goal of being a leader in healthcare. Moreover, enhanced nursing competencies can improve patient outcomes and satisfaction, directly contributing to the organization’s mission of delivering high-quality patient care. The nurse educator’s role is vital to achieving these broader organizational impacts (Moseikina et al., 2022). Incorporation of Proposed Educational Technology Changes into Current or Future Nursing Education Programs The Learning Management System (LMS) will be seamlessly integrated into our existing and forthcoming nursing education programs, assuming the principal role in disseminating training materials and resources. The LMS’s flexibility enables both synchronous (real-time) and asynchronous learning, catering to the individual schedules and learning styles of our nursing staff. Beyond content delivery, the LMS is equipped with interactive features such as quizzes, modules, and discussion forums to foster engagement, promote knowledge retention, and stimulate critical thinking. In the long run, the data analytics component of the LMS will offer invaluable insights into individual and group learning progress (Koh & Kan, 2020). This will help us fine-tune our educational programs to better suit the needs of our nursing staff, ensuring our training remains relevant and impactful. Thus,

NURS FPX 6109 Assessment 1 Vila Health: Educational Technology Needs Assessment

Student Name Capella University NURS-FPX 6109 Integrating Technology into Nursing Education Prof. Name Date Educational Technology Needs Assessment This document seeks to assess the integration of technology in nursing education at St. Anthony Medical Center (SAMC). The evaluation examines the current utilization of technology by nurses, compares it to the desired state, and provides recommendations for addressing identified gaps. The goal is to offer insights that can guide enhancements in technology use for nursing practices at SAMC. Description of Current Use of Educational Technology At SAMC, technology is integral to both the educational environment and ongoing professional development for nurses. A key component is the use of e-learning platforms through SAMC’s Learning Management System (LMS). This system provides access to various courses, covering topics such as disease management and patient care protocols. These courses, including interactive modules and evaluations, contribute significantly to the growth of nursing staff (Mahdavi Ardestani et al., 2023). In hands-on training, SAMC employs high-fidelity simulation and virtual reality technologies, especially in procedural training and emergency response drills, creating a safe environment for skill enhancement. In the clinical context, the Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) is crucial, offering real-time guidance for decision-making and ensuring adherence to medical guidelines (Ahmed et al., 2023). However, there are concerns about varying technology usage among nursing staff, with comfort and tech-savviness playing significant roles. The lack of granular data on individual nurse engagement and its correlation with clinical performance is a notable gap. Additionally, there are uncertainties about the CDSS, such as its update process during critical events like the recent opioid crisis. Comparison of Current and Desired State of Educational Technology SWOT Analysis Strengths Weaknesses Opportunities Threats Existence of foundational educational technology Outdated content of the CDSS Update the CDSS with recent research and guidelines Risk of sub-optimal patient care due to outdated clinical guidance and inconsistent skills development Potential of tools to enhance clinical skills and patient care Inconsistent usage of e-learning resources and simulation training among nurses Enhance accessibility and user-friendliness of e-learning resources Unequal access to and benefits from educational technologies due to a lack of tech proficiency Discrepancy in technological comfort and proficiency among nursing staff More consistent integration of simulation training into the continuing professional education curriculum Broaden learning content to equip nurses with diverse knowledge and skills NURS FPX 6109 Assessment 1 Vila Health: Educational Technology Needs Assessment Based on this analysis, addressing the inconsistent utilization of e-learning resources and simulation training among nurses is crucial. Standardizing usage through a structured schedule or mandatory training sessions, along with ensuring digital literacy, can enhance equal access. For the CDSS, regular updates with recent research are recommended to align with evidence-based practices. Evaluation of Metrics for Current Educational Technology Use Evaluation metrics at SAMC include participation rates, completion rates, user satisfaction surveys, and performance assessments in e-learning courses. While these metrics offer insights, a more comprehensive analysis should include practical application metrics in the clinical environment. Observing improvements in clinical skills and decreased errors post-training could provide a more accurate assessment. Additionally, incorporating machine learning tools and advanced analytics could reveal patterns overlooked in conventional analyses. Alignment of Educational Technology with Organizational Mission SAMC’s strategic mission focuses on high-quality patient care and continuous learning. Educational technology aligns with this mission by providing continual learning opportunities and promoting self-directed learning through e-learning courses. Simulation equipment enhances practical skills without compromising patient safety, directly contributing to improved patient care. A regularly updated CDSS supports clinical decision-making, ensuring adherence to best practices and promoting better patient outcomes. Recommendations for Improving the Use of Educational Technology The primary recommendation is to improve the CDSS by ensuring regular updates with recent research findings. Addressing unequal access to e-learning resources requires strategies like digital literacy training and structured schedules. Promoting regular use of simulation equipment and implementing data analytics for monitoring technology outcomes are essential. Regular feedback from nursing staff through surveys is crucial for identifying areas of improvement and understanding the real impact of these technologies on learning and professional development (Ahmed et al., 2023). References Ahmed, U., Iqbal, K., & Aoun, M. (2023). Natural language processing for clinical decision support systems: A review of recent advances in healthcare. Journal of Intelligent Connectivity and Emerging Technologies, 8(2), 1–16. Link Akinola, S., & Telukdarie, A. (2023). Sustainable digital transformation in healthcare: Advancing a digital vascular health innovation solution. Sustainability, 15(13), 10417. DOI Mahdavi Ardestani, S. F., Adibi, S., Golshan, A., & Sadeghian, P. (2023). Factors influencing the effectiveness of e-learning in healthcare: A fuzzy ANP study. Healthcare, 11(14), 2035. DOI Volkow, N. D., & Blanco, C. (2023). Fentanyl and other opioid use disorders: Treatment and research needs. American Journal of Psychiatry, 180(6), 410–417. DOI NURS FPX 6109 Assessment 1 Vila Health: Educational Technology Needs Assessment White, N., Carter, H. E., Sanjeewa Kularatna, Borg, D. N., Brain, D. C., Tariq, A., Abell, B., Blythe, R., & McPhail, S. M. (2023). Evaluating the costs and consequences of computerized clinical decision support systems in hospitals: A scoping review and recommendations for future practice. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 30(6), 1205–1218. DOI