MSN Writing Services

NURS FPX 4060 Assessment 3 Disaster Recovery Plan

New Samples

Struggling With Your Assessments? Get Help From Our Tutors

    NURS FPX 4060 Assessment 3 Disaster Recovery Plan

    Student Name

    Capella University

    NURS FPX 4060 Practicing in the Community to Improve Population Health

    Prof. Name

    Date

    Disaster Recovery Plan

    Today, we will delve into a crisis response strategy tailored for the Vila Health community, focusing on mitigating the consequences of a train derailment incident. This unfortunate occurrence led to the loss of lives, medical admissions, displacement, and tainted water sources. Our approach intends to reduce health inequalities and enhance service accessibility, taking into account the distinct requirements and assets of the community. The plan is based on Healthy People 2020 and 2030 objectives, using the MAP-IT framework to guide its development. The framework ensures a systematic approach for identifying stakeholders, assessing needs, developing a targeted plan, implementing it, and tracking progress to ensure success.

    In this presentation, we will delve deeper into the determinants of health and barriers impacting safety, health, and disaster recovery efforts. We will also outline strategies for overcoming communication barriers, enhancing collaboration, and leveraging health and governmental policies to improve disaster recovery outcomes. Our goal is to ensure the resilience and well-being of the Vila Health community.

    Determinants of Health and Barriers Impacting Safety, Health, and Disaster Recovery Efforts

    In the context of a train derailment, various social, cultural, and economic factors influence health and act as barriers that hinder safety, well-being, and disaster recovery initiatives within the community. Each factor will be discussed separately, emphasizing their interrelationships and the cascading effects they have on one another.

    Cultural Factors

    Cultural factors play a significant role in disaster recovery efforts as they can impact communication, trust, and decision-making. Language barriers and cultural norms may affect the ability of some community members to access information, resources, and support during a disaster. Recognizing and addressing cultural factors can help in tailoring recovery efforts to the specific needs of diverse populations, ensuring inclusivity and promoting overall community resilience (Matarrita-Cascante et al., 2017).

    Social Factors and Social Support Networks

    Strong social support networks are crucial in disaster recovery efforts. However, social barriers such as isolation of vulnerable populations, including the elderly, disabled, and non-English speakers, can hinder access to healthcare and support systems. Strengthening social support networks through targeted outreach and community engagement can help individuals cope with the emotional and psychological impacts of the disaster and facilitate recovery (Ogbe et al., 2020). Addressing social barriers and their impact on recovery efforts is essential for a comprehensive disaster recovery plan.

    Economic Factors

    Socioeconomic status can impact an individual’s ability to cope with and recover from a disaster. Low-income families may have limited resources to evacuate, rebuild their homes, or access essential services (Rouhanizadeh & Kermanshachi, 2019). Addressing socioeconomic disparities requires targeted assistance programs and equitable distribution of resources to ensure that all community members can recover from the disaster, regardless of their income level (Lewis et al., 2019).

    Environmental Conditions 

    The train derailment scenario led to water supply contamination, posing a significant environmental barrier to health and safety. Restoring the community’s water supply and addressing other environmental hazards requires a collaborative effort among public health officials, environmental agencies, and the community. Addressing environmental conditions is crucial for ensuring the overall well-being of the community and preventing long-term health consequences (Mukhopadhyay et al., 2022).

    Determinants of Health (Healthy People 2030)

    The determinants of health, as identified by Healthy People 2030, include biological, behavioral, social, and environmental factors that can impact the health and well-being of individuals and communities. In the context of disaster recovery, understanding and addressing these determinants of health can help create a more comprehensive and effective recovery plan that considers the unique needs of the affected population (Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, n.d.).

    The interconnectedness of these factors is critical to understanding the complexity of disaster recovery efforts. For example, addressing socioeconomic disparities can improve access to healthcare services, as individuals with more resources can better cope with the disaster. Similarly, mitigating environmental conditions can have a positive impact on the overall well-being of the community, which in turn can contribute to a more robust social support network (Khatri & Assefa, 2022). A comprehensive disaster recovery plan must consider the interconnectedness of these factors to ensure a holistic approach to the community’s recovery. Recognizing and addressing these interrelationships allows for more efficient use of resources and a more effective response to the needs of the community during the recovery process.

    Disaster Recovery Plan to Lessen Health Disparities and Improve Access to Community Services

    The disaster recovery strategy for the Vila Health community, addressing the train derailment situation, has been developed using the Mobilize, Assess, Plan, Implement, and Track (MAP-IT) framework. The goal of this strategy is to reduce health inequalities and enhance access to community resources by integrating social justice principles and cultural awareness. The MAP-IT framework was used to guide the development of the disaster recovery strategy, and the plan includes the following evidence-based key components:

    Mobilize

    The disaster recovery strategy emphasizes the rapid mobilization of resources and personnel during a disaster. This includes volunteers to provide immediate medical assistance, temporary shelters, and essential supplies. Focusing on marginalized groups ensures that they receive adequate support during the recovery process (Greiner et al., 2020).

    Assess

    A central command center has been established for coordinating and communicating among healthcare providers, emergency responders, and government agencies during disaster response. It ensures that resources are allocated fairly and efficiently and that information is shared transparently among stakeholders (Brown et al., 2022).

    Plan

    Vulnerable populations such as the elderly, disabled, and those with limited English proficiency have been identified and prioritized during disaster response. Prioritizing their needs and ensuring that assistance is tailored to their unique circumstances promotes health equity throughout the community (Torani et al., 2019).

    Implement

    Disaster response plans include culturally sensitive mental health support services to help community members cope with the emotional impact of the disaster. Addressing the diverse needs of the community ensures that everyone has access to the psychological support they need (Morganstein & Ursano, 2020). Swiftly reestablishing access to healthcare services and establishments is also vital in the process of disaster recovery. Considering the unique needs of different cultural, linguistic, and socio-economic groups ensures that healthcare services are accessible to everyone in the community (Sheikhi et al., 2020).

    Track

    The disaster recovery strategy includes regular monitoring of the recovery efforts, assessing the impact of the intervention on vulnerable populations, and evaluating the effectiveness of the mental health and healthcare support services provided (Rudowitz et al., 2019). Tracking progress helps identify gaps and areas for improvement, ensuring that the disaster recovery strategy is responsive and adaptive to the changing needs of the community.

    This disaster recovery strategy for the Vila Health community aims to promote health equity for individuals, families, and groups by integrating the principles of social justice and cultural awareness. Social justice ensures that assistance is provided to those most vulnerable and affected, guaranteeing access to essential services and support for everyone, irrespective of their socioeconomic status, race, or other factors. In addition, cultural awareness plays a crucial role in customizing communication, support, and resources to accommodate the unique needs of different cultural groups, which helps build trust, enhance cooperation.

    It also ensures that all community members feel respected and included during the recovery process. By focusing on the unique needs of different populations, advocating for the fair distribution of resources, and cultivating a sense of unity and resilience among community members, this disaster recovery strategy aims to reduce disparities during the recovery process and foster a sense of unity and resilience among community members.

    Health and Governmental Policy Impact on Disaster Recovery Efforts

    Health and governmental policies can significantly impact disaster recovery efforts by providing funding, guidance, and support for emergency preparedness and response. The following are two policies that can positively influence disaster recovery efforts, especially in response to train derailment scenarios like the one experienced in the Vila Health community:

    1. The Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act: This federal law provides a systematic approach to disaster assistance and emergency management in the United States. It authorizes the President to declare disasters and mobilize federal resources to support state and local response efforts. This policy ensures that communities like Vila Health can receive necessary financial assistance and logistical support during disaster recovery, such as the train derailment scenario. The Act also encourages the development of comprehensive preparedness plans, which can improve the efficiency and effectiveness of disaster recovery efforts (Reinke & Bevilacqua, 2022).
    2. The National Health Security Strategy (NHSS): The NHSS is a comprehensive framework designed to protect the nation’s health during disasters and emergencies. This approach encourages cooperation among federal, state, local, and tribal authorities, along with private sector participation, to fortify the nation’s capacity to avert, identify, and address public health hazards. The NHSS emphasizes the importance of community resilience and the need to address health disparities in disaster response (Pollock et al., 2019).  In the context of the Vila Health community, the implementation of NHSS guidance can enhance the disaster recovery plan by ensuring that vulnerable populations receive the support they need and that health equity is prioritized during the response (Lee et al., 2023).
    NURS FPX 4060 Assessment 3 Disaster Recovery Plan

    The Stafford Act and the NHSS exemplify the influence of health and governmental policies on disaster recovery initiatives. By offering an organized structure and supporting the fair distribution of resources, these policies can contribute to better disaster recovery results for the Vila Health community and other communities encountering comparable difficulties (Omboni et al., 2022).

    Strategies to Overcome Communication Barriers and Enhance Inter-Professional Collaboration

    Evidence-based strategies to overcome communication barriers and enhance inter-professional collaboration in the context of the train derailment scenario include:

    NURS FPX 4060 Assessment 3 Disaster Recovery Plan
    1. Regular training sessions for healthcare providers and emergency responders on effective communication, teamwork, and cultural competence: Providing ongoing training in these areas can improve the quality of communication and collaboration among different professionals involved in disaster response. This can help ensure that all team members understand their roles and responsibilities, as well as the needs of the affected community (Jillson et al., 2019).
    2. Utilizing technology, such as mobile apps and social media platforms, to share information and coordinate efforts during a disaster: Technology can facilitate real-time communication and information-sharing among various agencies and stakeholders during disaster recovery efforts. Social media platforms can also be used to share updates and information with the public, ensuring they have accurate and timely information about the situation (Madanian et al., 2023).
    3. Establishing protocols for information sharing and decision-making among various agencies involved in disaster recovery efforts: Clear protocols can help streamline the communication process and avoid confusion or delays during a crisis. Protocols should outline the roles and responsibilities of each agency, as well as the procedures for sharing information and making decisions (Charlton et al., 2021).
    4. Providing language interpretation services and culturally appropriate resources to ensure effective communication with diverse community members affected by the train derailment: Access to language services can help overcome language barriers and ensure all community members can access critical information and services during disaster recovery. Culturally appropriate resources can also help ensure that information is understood and well-received by individuals from different cultural backgrounds (Kianian et al., 2022).
    NURS FPX 4060 Assessment 3 Disaster Recovery Plan

    Implementing these strategies will have significant implications for the success of disaster recovery efforts and the well-being of the community. Improved communication and collaboration can lead to more efficient and effective disaster response, ultimately reducing the overall impact on the affected population and promoting a quicker return to normalcy (Zhang et al., 2023).

    Conclusion

    In conclusion, our comprehensive disaster recovery plan addresses the aftermath of the train derailment scenario in the Vila Health community by considering the determinants of health, barriers impacting safety, health, and disaster recovery efforts, and the effects of health and governmental policies. We have suggested strategies grounded in evidence to tackle communication obstacles and improve interdisciplinary cooperation, which is essential for the effectiveness of disaster recovery endeavors.

    Our plan aims to lessen health disparities, improve access to community services, and promote health equity by incorporating principles of social justice and cultural sensitivity. Through regular training sessions, the use of technology, clear protocols, and the provision of language interpretation services, we can ensure that our disaster recovery plan is effective and inclusive. Together, we can help the Vila Health community recover from this devastating train derailment and build a more resilient and equitable future for all its members. Thank you for your attention, and I’m happy to answer any questions you may have.

    References

    Brown, M. R., Fifolt, M., Lee, H., Nabavi, M., Kidd, E., Viles, A., Lee White, M., & McCormick, L. C. (2022). Disaster preparedness: An interprofessional student incident command system simulation. Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice, 100507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xjep.2022.100507 

    Charlton, C. L., Hull, N., Sloma, C. R., Bonifas, M., Johnson, M., Strain, A. K., … & Bind, E. P. (2021). How to prepare for the unexpected: A public health laboratory response. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 34(3), e00183-20. https://doi.org/10.1128/cmr.00183-20

    Greiner, A. L., Stehling-Ariza, T., Bugli, D., Hoffman, A., Giese, C., Moorhouse, L., Neatherlin, J. C., & Shahpar, C. (2020). Challenges in public health rapid response team management. Health Security, 18(S1), S-8-S-13. https://doi.org/10.1089/hs.2019.0060 

    Jillson, I. A., Clarke, M., Allen, C., Waller, S., Koehlmoos, T., Mumford, W., Jansen, J., McKay, K., & Trant, A. (2019). Improving the science and evidence base of disaster response: Policy research study. BMC Health Services Research, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4102-5 

    Khatri, R. B., & Assefa, Y. (2022). Access to health services among culturally and linguistically diverse populations in the Australian universal health care system: Issues and challenges. BMC Public Health, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13256-z

    NURS FPX 4060 Assessment 3 Disaster Recovery Plan

    Kianian, T., Pakpour, V., Zamanzadeh, V., Lotfi, M., Rezayan, A., Hazrati, M., & Gholizadeh, M. (2022). Cultural factors and social changes affecting home healthcare in Iran: A qualitative study. Home Health Care Management & Practice, 108482232110722. https://doi.org/10.1177/10848223211072224 

    Lee, J. M., Jansen, R., Sanderson, K. E., Guerra, F., Keller-Olaman, S., Murti, M., O’Sullivan, T. L., Law, M. P., Schwartz, B., Bourns, L. E., & Khan, Y. (2023). Public health emergency preparedness for infectious disease emergencies: A scoping review of recent evidence. BMC Public Health, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15313-7 

    Lewis, J., Hernández, D., & Geronimus, A. T. (2019). Energy efficiency as energy justice: Addressing racial inequities through investments in people and places. Energy Efficiency. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-019-09820-z

    Madanian, S., Abbas, R. A., Norris, T., & Parry, D. (2023). Mobile technologies in disaster healthcare: Technology and operational aspects. In Research Anthology on Managing Crisis and Risk Communications. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-9645-7.ch004 

    NURS FPX 4060 Assessment 3 Disaster Recovery Plan

    Morganstein, J. C., & Ursano, R. J. (2020). Ecological disasters and mental health: Causes, consequences, and interventions. Frontiers in psychiatry, 11, 1. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00001 

    Mukhopadhyay, A., Duttagupta, S., & Mukherjee, A. (2022). Emerging organic contaminants in global community drinking water sources and supply: A review of occurrences, processes and removal. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 107560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2022.107560 

    Ogbe, E., Harmon, S., Van den Bergh, R., & Degomme, O. (2020). A systematic review of intimate partner violence interventions focused on improving social support and mental health outcomes of survivors. PLOS ONE, 15(6), e0235177. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235177

    Omboni, S., Padwal, R. S., Alessa, T., Benczúr, B., Green, B. B., Hubbard, I., Kario, K., Khan, N. A., Konradi, A., Logan, A. G., Lu, Y., Mars, M., McManus, R. J., Melville, S., Neumann, C. L., Parati, G., Renna, N. F., Ryvlin, P., Saner, H., & Schutte, A. E. (2022). The worldwide impact of telemedicine during COVID-19: Current evidence and recommendations for the future. Connected Health. https://doi.org/10.20517/ch.2021.03 

    Pollock, M. J., Wennerstrom, A., True, G., Everett, A., Sugarman, O., Haywood, C., Johnson, A., Meyers, D., Sato, J., Wells, K. B., Arevian, A. C., Massimi, M., Berry, J., Riefberg, L., Onyewuenyi, N., & Springgate, B. (2019). Preparedness and community resilience in disaster-prone areas: Cross-sectoral collaborations in South Louisiana, 2018. American Journal of Public Health, 109(S4), S309–S315. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2019.305152 

    NURS FPX 4060 Assessment 3 Disaster Recovery Plan

    Pradhan, N. A., Najmi, R., & Fatmi, Z. (2022). District health systems capacity to maintain healthcare service delivery in Pakistan during floods: A qualitative study. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 78, 103092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103092

    Reinke, A. J., & Bevilacqua, N. (2022). Legal aid amid bureaucracy. Journal of Legal Anthropology, 6(2), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3167/jla.2022.060201 

    Rouhanizadeh, B., & Kermanshachi, S. (2019). Investigating the relationships of socioeconomic factors delaying post-disaster reconstruction. Computing in Civil Engineering 2019. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784482445.005

    Sheikhi, R. A., Seyedin, H., Qanizadeh, G., & Jahangiri, K. (2020). Role of religious institutions in disaster risk management: A systematic review. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2019.145

    Torani, S., Majd, P. M., Maroufi, S. S., Dowlati, M., & Sheikhi, R. A. (2019). The importance of education on disasters and emergencies: A review article. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 8, 85. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_262_18 

    Zhang, Y., Moyle, B., Dupré, K., Lohmann, G., Desha, C., & MacKenzie, I. (2023). Tourism and natural disaster management: A systematic narrative review. Tourism Review. https://doi.org/10.1108/tr-08-2022-0377