MSN Writing Services

NHS FPX 6004 Assessment 3 Training Session for Policy Implementation

New Samples

Struggling With Your Assessments? Get Help From Our Tutors

    NHS FPX 6004 Assessment 3 Training Session for Policy Implementation

    Student Name

    Capella University

    NHS-FPX 6004 Health Care Law and Policy

    Prof. Name

    Date

    Training Session for Policy Implementation

    Welcome all; this presentation aims to illuminate the training session for policy implementation in our renowned Mercy Medical Center. First, we will discuss the agenda to discuss.

    Agenda 

    This presentation will discuss the training strategies for physicians to implement policies in MMC. First, I will discuss the need for this policy and evidence-based strategies for working with physicians to implement the new policy. Moreover, I will highlight the policy developed for Diabetics in MMC and its impact on patients and overall hospital functions. Furthermore, I will discuss the role of physicians in implementing new policy and practice guidelines. Lastly, I will discuss some instructional content, learning activities, and materials required for a training session.

    Need for Policy Implementation 

    The need for policy implementation arose when the dashboard metrics on Diabetes management in MMC showed underperformance in several benchmarks, including HbA1c testing and eye and foot examination. Considering the alarming situation where the health of diabetics was at stake, the healthcare authorities endeavored to develop a policy on HbA1c testing for diabetics. This policy mandated HbA1c testing every six months for all diabetics to evaluate the glycemic levels and promote care and treatment accordingly. For this purpose, your presence as primary care physician is highly honored for your staunch and devoted struggles to bring a meaningful change in patients’ lives. You all will play a key role in implementing this policy in our hospital so diabetics’ quality of life can be enhanced. 

    Evidence-Based Strategies for Working with Physicians

    To work with physicians to promote their buy-in and prepare them to implement a new policy and associated practice guidelines, it is essential to look for evidence-based strategies that promise these results. Several evidence-based strategies are present in studies that enhance working with physicians, such as communicating openly and transparently with physicians in meetings where the rationale behind this policy on HbA1c is highlighted and their valuable insights are welcomed (Toth-Manikowski et al., 2021).

    Moreover, ensuring their inclusivity in the decision-making process of policy development will make them feel valued, and their buy-in and participation in the policy implementation process can be enhanced. Healthcare organizations can bring a reward and bonuses policy for physicians who successfully implement the HbA1c policy and practice guidelines. This will promote their preparation in the implementation process of the new policy, as they will be rewarded with incentives for proper adherence to policy implementation and practice guidelines (Vlaev et al., 2019). 

    Additionally, offering educational sessions through the use of social media on the importance of HbA1c testing frequency description and associated practice guidelines as evidence-based studies and authentic organizations can help prepare them to implement new policy and practice guidelines. The educational content should be tailored to their specific concerns and areas of interest and its benefit for patients regarding their quality of care and safety (Chan et al., 2019).

    NHS FPX 6004 Assessment 3 Training Session for Policy Implementation

    Another evidence-based strategy to work with physicians includes fostering a culture of interdisciplinary collaboration where physicians, nurses, pharmacists, and hospital administrators collaborate to manage patients’ diabetes and create convenience for all team members in providing high-quality care to diabetics from HbA1c testing and evaluation to their diabetes management (Kassai et al., 2020). The effectiveness of these strategies is evident from the research-based studies where these strategies have brought effective results and, if implemented correctly, can bring effective results in MMC to promote policy implementation for diabetics.

    Moreover, some measures can indicate the early success of implementing these policies, such as well-managed diabetes in patients, fewer hospital readmission rates due to untreated and unmanaged diabetes, improved patient satisfaction, and reduced diabetes-related complications evaluation through dashboard metrics.

    Impact of New Policy and Practice Guidelines

    Implementing the HbA1c policy and associated practice guidelines positively impacts the patients, the work-life of the health professionals, and the hospital’s overall performance and reputation. By stringent compliance with the developed policy, patients can get their glycemic levels evaluated regularly through HbA1c testing, and physicians can provide appropriate care treatments, including self-management education alone or pharmacological therapy. This will improve glycemic control with fewer diabetes-related complications when hyperglycemia prevails (Suh et al., 2023).

    Moreover, biannual HbA1c testing enables healthcare professionals to identify patterns and trends in blood glucose levels that are useful in adjusting treatments and preventing drastic fluctuations in glycemic levels. This policy will enable patient-centered care according to their HbA1c levels and promote treatment adherence in diabetics. Considering the healthcare organization’s perspective, this policy can promote better care for diabetics and enhance job satisfaction among healthcare professionals as they provide care treatments according to the practice guidelines. Moreover, the hospital’s reputation will be enhanced and sustained as it provides effective care treatment to diabetic patients, intricately regulating their blood glucose levels through this policy.

    Practice Guidelines

    EHR in reminding diabetics’ HbA1c testing schedule will lead to strong adherence to policy implementation, as notifications on individual’s patient’s HbA1c testing will enable healthcare professionals to conduct and evaluate these tests. Moreover, practicing patient education on HbA1c significance through educational brochures will enlighten patients on glycemic levels and what they indicate, leading to empowered patients as they will be eager to maintain their glycemic levels (Chen et al., 2021). Furthermore, the healthcare staff training will enhance their knowledge of HbA1c, particularly in novice physicians and nurses who may neglect these tests in patients, leading to improved quality of care.

    Effects on Physicians’ Daily Work Routines

    Implementation of this policy and practice guidelines can impact physicians’ daily work routines as they will have to overwork and guide patients on HbA1c testing with its significance. The training sessions for physicians may require extra time leading to work burnout and anxiety. Moreover, physicians will need to collaborate with nurses or laboratory technicians to implement this policy as they perform these tests properly; this may lead to longer wait times and impact physicians’ work routines in the hospital. The physicians must manage their time and enhance interprofessional collaboration and communication to prevent the negative impact of implementing this policy and practice guidelines (Patel et al., 2019). 

    The complex policy considerations or practice guidelines must be considered for effective implementation. This can be done by understanding the time taking process of policy and practice guidelines implementation. Moreover, considering resistance to change in the policy implementation may require a better spread of the need for policy. This can be achieved by using plain language that is comprehended by patients and physicians and providing visual aids to understand the policy and practice guidelines better.

    Importance of New Policy and Practice Guidelines 

    The HbA1c testing holds great value in diabetes care and its effective management. By early detection of HbA1c levels, physicians can evaluate the status of diabetes in patients and provide care treatment best suited to their health needs based on the measurements. This testing helps physicians diagnose the disease in patients and indicate further plans to choose for diabetics. Developing and implementing adequate care treatment plans for diabetics result in improved quality of care, and their glycemic levels are well-controlled, leading to improved health outcomes.

    The biannual evaluation of HbA1c levels as a practice guideline will give physicians a timeline on glycemic levels depicting the severity of diabetes. Furthermore, the selection of a treatment plan and its adjustments are all dependent on glycemic levels. Without sufficient data on glycemic levels in the blood, physicians will be unable to diagnose and treat diabetes leading to the onset of diabetes-related comorbidities, and that may lead to higher mortality rates among diabetes patients. Therefore, this policy holds significant value in providing the best quality care treatment to diabetics and its consistent management (Al-Awkally et al., 2022).

    Role Group’s Importance in Implementing a New Policy

    Primary care physicians play a central role in assessing HbA1c levels in patients with diabetes and prescribing care treatment accordingly. Therefore, physicians must be crucial in implementing and sustaining policy on the HbA1c test for diabetics. They must collaborate with the hospital’s administration and relevant stakeholders to implement this policy in MMC as this will lead to an empowered system where patient safety and improved quality of care is the main priority.

    Moreover, physicians can guide other health professionals including nurses who should coordinate with them to ensure this policy is properly followed by all healthcare professionals. By implementing this policy and practice guidelines, physicians can bring improvement in health outcomes of diabetics as a valuable change that can lead them to live a healthier life with balanced control of diabetes. This will enhance their job satisfaction and patient satisfaction (Verulava, 2022). For successful implementation, physicians’ buy-in is necessary as they will adhere to the policy themselves while advocating for others to implement the developed policy for diabetics. 

    Future Vision

    Through unwavering endeavors in implementing new policies and guidelines, physicians can positively contribute to providing patient-centered care and holistic management of diabetes. Furthermore, they can foster a culture of collaboration within a healthcare organization as diabetes management, from screening tests of HbA1c testing to diabetes care treatment and control, requires collaborative partnership with patients and relevant healthcare professionals. This can lead to patient empowerment as early detection and intervention through regular HbA1c testing, along with harnessing patients’ knowledge of diabetes, will prevent diabetes-associated comorbidities resulting in building healthier communities overall. 

    Learning Activities for a Training Session

    To conduct a practical training session for physicians on policy implementation and practice guidelines, it is essential to have a structured approach, including instructional content, learning activities, and materials in a training session. The instructional content will include an overview of HbA1c testing, its significance, and the harms of not conducting these tests. This will be followed by the policy introduction and the rationale behind its development and highlighting the implementation of this policy aligned with evidence-based practice. Next, the practice guidelines and their implementation will be included to provide a concise and compelling overview of these practice guidelines.

    This instructional content will promote skill development and enhance their learning as evidence-based knowledge is conveyed (Wong et al., 2020). For learning activities, physicians will participate in role-play exercises where they conduct simulated discussions with patients on the benefits of biannual HbA1c testing. They can further participate in Q&A sessions to openly ask questions and seek further information to uplift any confusion and discuss particular concerns toward policy and practice guidelines. The learning activities will be effective in skill development as they practice their knowledge gained through instructional content in the form of these activities (Dhillon et al., 2020).

    NHS FPX 6004 Assessment 3 Training Session for Policy Implementation

    The materials for the training session will include PowerPoints on HbA1c policy and practice guidelines and educational brochures. Visual aids in PowerPoints and educational handouts will enhance physicians’ learning and promote better practice in the real-life implementation of these policies and practice guidelines (Mbanda et al., 2020).   This training session will be completed within two hours as everything will be concise and to the point covering all aspects of policy and practice guidelines.

    All these proposed activities effectively support learning and skill development as the physicians will practice through learning activities after gaining valuable knowledge from instructions. This will fulfill particular demands of implementing new policy and practice guidelines, such as communication and coordination about policy implementation, comprehensive training, patient engagement, and patient-centered care. 

    Conclusion

    This PowerPoint presentation on the training session focuses on implementing the HbA1c policy biannually in MMC. For this purpose, we discussed evidence-based strategies to work with physicians and the impact and importance of new policy and practice guidelines. Later, we discussed the role of physicians in implementing policy and practice guidelines which led us to discuss the instructional content and learning activities for training sessions. Thank you.

    References

    Al-Awkally, N. A. M., Ghriba, I. M., Eljamay, S. M., Alabeedi, R. M., Ali, M. A.-D., Al-Awkally, A. M., Awad, S. M., Mousaay, W. O., Al-Awkally, N. M., & Ghareeb, K. S. (2022). The role of hba1c as a screening and diagnostic test for diabetes mellitus in Benghazi city. African Journal of Advanced Pure and Applied Sciences (AJAPAS), 5–11. https://aaasjournals.com/index.php/ajapas/article/view/28 

    Chan, T. M., Dzara, K., Dimeo, S. P., Bhalerao, A., & Maggio, L. A. (2019). Social media in knowledge translation and education for physicians and trainees: A scoping review. Perspectives on Medical Education, 9(1), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-019-00542-7 

    Chen, Y., Tian, Y., Sun, X., Wang, B., & Huang, X. (2021). Effectiveness of empowerment-based intervention on hba1c and self-efficacy among cases with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Medicine, 100(38), e27353. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000027353

    Dhillon, J., Salimi, A., & ElHawary, H. (2020). Impact of COVID-19 on canadian medical education: Pre-clerkship and clerkship students affected differently. Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development, 7, 238212052096524. https://doi.org/10.1177/2382120520965247  

    NHS FPX 6004 Assessment 3 Training Session for Policy Implementation

    Kassai, R., van Weel, C., Flegg, K., Tong, S. F., Han, T. M., Noknoy, S., Dashtseren, M., Le An, P., Ng, C. J., Khoo, E. M., Noh, K. M., Lee, M.-C., Howe, A., & Goodyear-Smith, F. (2020). Priorities for primary health care policy implementation: Recommendations from the combined experience of six countries in the Asia–Pacific. Australian Journal of Primary Health, 26(5), 351. https://doi.org/10.1071/py19194 

    Mbanda, N., Dada, S., Bastable, K., Ingalill, G.-B., & Ralf W., S. (2020). A scoping review of the use of visual aids in health education materials for persons with low-literacy levels. Patient Education and Counseling, 104(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2020.11.034 

    Patel, R. S., Sekhri, S., Bhimanadham, N. N., Imran, S., & Hossain, S. (2019). A review on strategies to manage physician burnout. Cureus, 11(6). https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.4805 

    Suh, J., Choi, Y., Oh, J. S., Song, K., Choi, H. S., Kwon, A., Chae, H. W., & Kim, H.-S. (2023). Association between early glycemic management and diabetes complications in type 1 diabetes mellitus: A retrospective cohort study. Primary Care Diabetes, 17(1), 60–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcd.2022.12.006 

    NHS FPX 6004 Assessment 3 Training Session for Policy Implementation

    Toth-Manikowski, S. M., Swirsky, E. S., Gandhi, R., & Piscitello, G. (2021). COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy among health care workers, communication, and policy-making. American Journal of Infection Control, 50(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2021.10.004 

    Verulava, T. (2022). Job satisfaction and associated factors among physicians. Hospital Topics, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/00185868.2022.2087576 

    Vlaev, I., King, D., Darzi, A., & Dolan, P. (2019). Changing health behaviors using financial incentives: A review from behavioral economics. BMC Public Health, 19(1), 1059. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7407-8 

    Wong, M. C., Huang, J., & Kong, A. P. (2020). Diabetes screening revisited: Issues related to implementation. Hong Kong Medical Journal, 26(4), 283–285. https://doi.org/10.12809/hkmj205103